ஐபிஎல் இம்பாக்ட் பிளேயர் விதியில் பிளவுபட்ட கருத்து உள்ளது; சிலர் அதை ஆதரிக்கிறார்கள், மற்றவர்கள், ரோஹித் சர்மா மற்றும் விராட் கோலி போன்றவர்கள், 12 வது வீரரை சேர்ப்பதற்கு எதிராக உள்ளனர்.
In a surprising move, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has decided to eliminate the Impact Player rule from the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy (SMAT), the country’s premier domestic T20 competition. This decision, while somewhat anticipated, contrasts sharply with the BCCI’s continued commitment to the rule in the Indian Premier League (IPL).
Impact Player: Gone, but not from IPL
Back in the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2022, BCCI introduced a new rule in the form of the ‘Impact Player/Substitution’. This not only converted the game of 11 players to 12 but added a brand new dynamism. Fast-forward two years, the rule came under huge scrutiny for hindering the development of all-rounders. However, the BCCI, who came up with a host of changes on IPL retention and much more, decided to continue with the Impact Player rule.
More on Cricket
The SMAT, set to commence on November 23 and conclude on December 15, will now be played without the Impact Player provision. The BCCI’s communication to state associations on Monday (October 14) evening confirmed this change.
Double standards from BCCI?
While the BCCI has opted to remove the rule from the SMAT, it has reaffirmed its stance on retaining it in the IPL. Recently, the BCCI informed IPL franchises that the Impact Player rule will remain in place for the upcoming season. This decision raises questions about the BCCI’s rationale for maintaining the rule in one competition while abandoning it in another. However, we can speculate that the IPL’s commercial importance and its global appeal may be factors influencing the BCCI’s stance.
However, despite its commercial success, the Impact Player rule faced criticism from many within the cricketing fraternity. Captains and coaches argued that the rule disrupted the balance and flow of the game, making it difficult to plan and execute strategies effectively. Moreover, some felt that the rule hindered the development of all-rounders, as teams began to prioritize specialists over players with a combination of skills.
Editor’s Pick
Top Stories
சமூக ஊடகங்களில் எங்களைப் பின்தொடரவும்
எங்கள் கட்டுரை உங்களுக்கு ஏன் பிடிக்கவில்லை என்று எங்களிடம் கூறுங்கள், அதனால் நாங்கள் மேம்படுத்த முடியும்?
